Table 2 Neural Correlates of Optimality of KS.

From: Neurocognitive Signatures of Naturalistic Reading of Scientific Texts: A Fixation-Related fMRI Study

H

Regions

Voxel

p

T

B.A.

[x, y, z]

Neural Correlates of Integrative Processing for Texts with Optimal KS

L

MTG & STG

122

0.001

4.81

22 & 21

−51 −46 −2

L

DLPFC (SFG & MFG)

92

0.003

4.66

6 & 8

−48 11 50

Neural Correlates of Integrative Processing for Texts with Sub-optimal KS

B

dACC

204

<0.001

5.21

32

3 35 26

L

FPC (MFG) & IFG pars triangularis

66

0.015

4.42

46 & 10

−39 44 10

Neural Correlates of Sub-optimal KS Processing in Individuals with higher GSRT

L

FPC (MFG)

77

0.007

5.19

10

−30 38 26

L

SMA

70

0.01

5.09

6

−12 −1 62

Neural Correlates of Sub-optimal KS Processing in Individuals with higher E-device Usage

L

TPJ (MTG & Angular gyrus)

50

0.039

4.21

22 & 39

−36 −58 18

Neural Correlates of Sub-optimal KS Processing in Individuals with lower E-device Usage

R

Claustrum

53

0.031

5.81

 

27 20 18

  1. *Cluster-level FWE corrected p-values with CDT p = 0.001 uncorrected.
  2. Abbreviations: dACC = dorsal anterior cingulate cortex; DLPFC = dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; FPC = frontopolar cortex; IFG = inferior frontal gyrus; MFG = middle frontal gyrus; MTG = middle temporal gyrus; SMA = supplementary motor area; STG = superior temporal gyrus; TPJ = temporoparietal junction; H = hemisphere; L = left; R = right; p = p-value; T = T-value; B.A. = Brodmann area; x, y, z = MNI coordinates.
Back to article page