Table 2 Optimal interrater reliability of ratings made using the Zaidi–Dayal and Richards–Jabbour scales.

From: Interrater and intrarater agreement and reliability of ratings made using the Zaidi–Dayal and Richards–Jabbour scales for the shape of the foramen magnum

Zaidi–Dayal scale

Session one

Session two

Optimal two-categories solution

Category one

“Round”, “Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, “Tetragonal”, or “Irregular”

“Round”, “Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, “Tetragonal”, “Pentagonal”, or “Irregular”

Category two

“Pentagonal” or “Hexagonal”

“Hexagonal”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.49 (0.38–0.63)

0.50 (0.37–0.65)

Optimal three-categories solution

Category one

“Round”, “Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, “Tetragonal”, or “Irregular”

“Round”

Category two

“Pentagonal”

“Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, “Tetragonal”, “Pentagonal”, or “Irregular”

Category three

“Hexagonal”

“Hexagonal”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.46 (0.36–0.58)

0.43 (0.33–0.56)

Optimal four-categories solution

Category one

“Round”

“Round”

Category two

“Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, “Tetragonal”, or “Irregular”

“Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, “Tetragonal”, “Pentagonal”

Category three

“Pentagonal”

“Hexagonal”

Category four

“Hexagonal”

“Irregular”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.42 (0.34–0.54)

0.40 (0.31–0.53)

Optimal five-categories solution

Category one

“Round”

“Round”

Category two

“Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, or “Tetragonal”

“Oval”, “Egg-shaped”, or “Tetragonal”

Category three

“Pentagonal”

“Pentagonal”

Category four

“Hexagonal”

“Hexagonal”

Category five

“Irregular”

“Irregular”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.40 (0.32–0.54)

0.37 (0.27–0.47)

Optimal six-categories solution

Category one

“Round”

“Round”

Category two

“Oval” or “Egg-shaped”

“Oval” or “Egg-shaped”

Category three

“Tetragonal”

“Tetragonal”

Category four

“Pentagonal”

“Pentagonal”

Category five

“Hexagonal”

“Hexagonal”

Category six

“Irregular”

“Irregular”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.37 (0.29–0.46)

0.33 (0.25–0.42)

Richards–Jabbour scale

Session one

Session two

Optimal two-categories solution

Category one

Circular, “Two semicircles”, “Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, or “Bi-pointed oval”

Circular, “Two semicircles”, “Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, “Ventrally wide oval”, “Bi-pointed oval”, or “Dorsally convergent oval”

Category two

“Heart-like”, “Ventrally wide oval”, or “Dorsally convergent oval”

“Heart-like”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.30 (0.18–0.49)

0.33 (0.19–0.45)

Optimal three-categories solution

Category one

Circular

Circular

Category two

“Two semicircles”, “Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, or “Bi-pointed oval”

“Two semicircles”, “Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, “Ventrally wide oval”, “Bi-pointed oval”, or “Dorsally convergent oval”

Category three

“Heart-like”, “Ventrally wide oval”, or “Dorsally convergent oval”

“Heart-like”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.27 (0.16–0.41)

0.26 (0.16–0.37)

Optimal four-categories solution

Category one

Circular

Circular, “Two semicircles”, or “Ventrally wide oval”

Category two

“Two semicircles”, “Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, or “Bi-pointed oval”

“Heart-like”

Category three

“Heart-like” or “Dorsally convergent oval”

“Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, or “Bi-pointed oval”

Category four

“Ventrally wide oval”

“Dorsally convergent oval”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.23 (0.16–0.32)

0.22 (0.15–0.34)

Optimal five-categories solution

Category one

Circular

Circular, “Two semicircles”, or “Ventrally wide oval”

Category two

“Two semicircles”, “Wide oval”, “Bi-rounded oval”, or “Bi-pointed oval”

“Heart-like”

Category three

“Heart-like”

“Wide oval”

Category four

“Ventrally wide oval”

“Bi-rounded oval” or “Bi-pointed oval”

Category five

“Dorsally convergent oval”

“Dorsally convergent oval”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.20 (0.14–0.28)

0.19 (0.14–0.28)

Optimal six-categories solution

Category one

Circular, “Two semicircles”, or “Wide oval”

Circular, “Two semicircles”, or “Ventrally wide oval”

Category two

“Heart-like”

“Heart-like”

Category three

“Bi-rounded oval”

“Wide oval”

Category four

“Ventrally wide oval”

“Bi-rounded oval”

Category five

“Bi-pointed oval”

“Bi-pointed oval”

Category six

“Dorsally convergent oval”

“Dorsally convergent oval”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.18 (0.13–0.26)

0.17 (0.13–0.26)

Optimal seven-categories solution

Category one

Circular

Circular or “Two semicircles”

Category two

“Two semicircles”

“Heart-like”

Category three

“Heart-like” or “Dorsally convergent oval”

“Wide oval”

Category four

“Wide oval”

“Bi-rounded oval”

Category five

“Bi-rounded oval”

“Ventrally wide oval”

Category six

“Ventrally wide oval”

“Bi-pointed oval”

Category seven

“Bi-pointed oval”

“Dorsally convergent oval”

Fleiss’ κ (95% CI)

0.16 (0.11–0.20)

0.14 (0.10–0.21)