Table 3 Multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis for risk of moderate-to-severe LEAD.

From: Simple-to-use nomogram for evaluating the incident risk of moderate-to-severe LEAD in adults with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study in a Chinese population

Index

 

B

OR

95% CI

p

Sex

Model 1

0.35

1.42

(1.19, 1.71)

<0.05

Model 2

0.05

1.03

(0.09, 1.42)

0.21

Age

Model 1

0.00

1.00

(0.99, 1.01)

0.40

Model 2

0.01

1.01

(1.00, 1.02)

0.16

Duration

Model 1

0.00

1.00

(0.99, 1.01)

0.80

Model 2

0.01

1.01

(0.99, 1.02)

0.32

Smoking

Model 1

−0.01

1.00

(0.80, 1.23)

0.93

Model 2

0.11

1.12

(0.85, 1.47)

0.43

CHD

Model 1

0.04

1.04

(0.83, 1.32)

0.72

Model 2

−0.17

0.85

(0.64, 1.13)

0.26

CBD

Model 1

0.03

1.03

(0.84, 1.28)

0.76

Model 2

−0.02

0.98

(0.76, 1.26)

0.85

HbA1c

Model 1

0.08

1.09

(1.05, 1.13)

<0.05

Model 2

0.07

1.07

(1.02, 1.13)

<0.05

Nephropathy

Model 1

0.05

1.05

(0.88, 1.26)

0.59

Model 2

0.04

1.04

(0.83, 1.31)

0.73

Neuropathy

Model 1

0.74

2.10

(1.78, 2.47)

<0.05

Model 2

0.66

1.93

(1.57, 2.37)

<0.05

Retinopathy

Model 1

0.28

1.32

(1.11, 1.57)

<0.05

Model 2

0.23

1.26

(1.01, 1.57)

<0.05

  1. CHD, coronary heart disease; CBD, cerebrovascular disease. Model 1 is adjusted for BMI, and Model 2 is adjusted for BMI, BP, TC, TG, LDL-C, HDL-C, and eGFR.
Back to article page