Table 2 Best models for each of the working hypothesis selected according to the model’s AICc and ΔAICc. The hypotheses and models with the higher support (and lower AICc values) are presented in bold.
Models | df | AICc | ΔAICc | AICc weight |
---|---|---|---|---|
H1 - productivity/food resources availability hypothesis | ||||
NDVI + Rabbit_abundance | 3 | 65.20 | 0.00 | 0.419 |
NDVI | 2 | 65.34 | 0.14 | 0.392 |
Rabbit_abundance | 2 | 66.79 | 1.59 | 0.189 |
H2 - Disturbance hypothesis | ||||
Road_network | 2 | 67.04 | 0.00 | 1.000 |
H3 - Life-history traits hypothesis | ||||
Body_size + Age | 3 | 61.67 | 0.00 | 0.162 |
Body_size + Age + Mongoose_dens | 4 | 61.67 | 0.00 | 0.162 |
Age + Mongoose_dens | 3 | 61.98 | 0.31 | 0.138 |
Age | 2 | 62.03 | 0.36 | 0.135 |
Gender + Body_size + Age | 4 | 62.97 | 1.30 | 0.085 |
Gender + Body_size + Age + Mongoose_dens | 5 | 63.00 | 1.33 | 0.083 |
Gender + Age + Mongoose_dens | 4 | 63.24 | 1.57 | 0.074 |
Gender + Age | 3 | 63.26 | 1.59 | 0.073 |
H4 - Climate and orography hypothesis | ||||
Altimetry + Annual_rainfall + Annual_temp_range + River_network | 5 | 55.87 | 0.00 | 0.542 |
Altimetry + Annual_rainfall + Annual_temp_range | 4 | 57.61 | 1.74 | 0.227 |
H5 – Cattle farm hypothesis | ||||
Dens_cattle_farm | 2 | 66.84 | 0.00 | 1.000 |