Table 3 Best performing EDR signals for different experiments and datasets.

From: A Comparative Study of ECG-derived Respiration in Ambulatory Monitoring using the Single-lead ECG

 

Respiratory Rate

Wave Morphology

Cardiorespiratory Interactions

Rank

Drivers

Fantasia

Sleep

Drivers

Fantasia

Sleep

Drivers

Fantasia

Sleep

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

high

low

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{r}(n)\)

                  

0

0

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{rs}(n)\)

X

     

X

       

X

  

x

3

1

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{p}(n)\)

  

X

 

X

   

X

 

X

       

4

0

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{k}(n)\)

  

X

 

X

   

X

 

X

       

4

0

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{up}(n)\)

              

X

   

1

0

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{dw}(n)\)

X

 

X

 

X

x

X

 

X

 

X

x

X

 

X

 

X

x

9

3

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{\theta }(n)\)

X

 

X

 

X

x

X

 

X

 

X

x

X

 

X

 

X

x

9

3

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{sr}(n)\)

X

 

X

 

X

x

X

 

X

 

X

   

X

 

X

x

8

2

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{cm}(n)\)

X

    

x

X

 

X

 

X

x

  

X

   

5

2

\({\widehat{{\boldsymbol{r}}}}_{a}(n)\)

                  

0

0

  1. Results are indicated for the high (q(k) > 80) and low (q(k) ≤ 80) quality segments. The marked signals correspond to those with the lowest (p < 0.05) errors, additionally, no significant difference was found among those marked. The rank indicates the number of experiments for which the signal performed best.