Figure 3 | Scientific Reports

Figure 3

From: Combination of Simultaneous Artificial Sensory Percepts to Identify Prosthetic Hand Postures: A Case Study

Figure 3

Comparisons between the trained and novel postures during the generalization session are provided here. (A) Accuracy of trained versus novel postures in G block across both mappings. Significant differences were seen across the trained and novel postures as well as across congruent and incongruent mappings (n = 40, 30 for trained and novel postures, respectively). (B) Mean response time of trained versus novel postures in G block across both mappings. The response time for novel postures was significantly slower than the response time for trained postures in the incongruent mapping (n = 40, 30 for trained and novel postures, respectively). (C, D) Total number of responses (light) and number of correct responses (dark) for each posture using congruent (C) and incongruent (D) mapping during the G block. Note the irregular number of responses across all postures during the anatomically incongruent generalization session and the relative stable number of responses across all postures in the anatomically congruent generalization session (n = 10 presentations per posture).

Back to article page