Figure 3 | Scientific Reports

Figure 3

From: OutPredict: multiple datasets can improve prediction of expression and inference of causality

Figure 3

Arabidopsis in Shoot Tissue (time series only dataset) (A) Predicted gene expression using OutPredict (grey dots) compared to actual expression (red line) at the left-out time point. (B) Comparison of time series forecasting: the accuracy of forecasting, measured by Mean Squared Error, has higher values in this case than for other species, because the data is RNAseq and read counts have a broad dynamic range. Table 2 describes which method and data were used for each model in the x axis. OutPredict (OP) performs 34.2% better than Penultimate Value (P < 0.05, non-parametric paired test), and 61.5% better than Dynamic Genie3 (P < 0.05, non-parametric paired test). The incorporation of priors from TARGET (OP-Priors) improves the performance of OutPredict compared to the time series alone (9% improvement with P = 0.12, non-parametric paired test). The ODE-log model is better than Time-Step based on the out-of-bag score. The Neural Network model doesn’t converge because the dataset is small.

Back to article page