Table 3 The table contains the results of skipped Spearman’s correlations between the subscales of BIS-BAS Scales, and the reward index of precision in younger adults (number of tested correlations (NC) = 4, corrected significance value (pc)> 0.05, 98.75% bootstrap confidence interval CI), reward index of reaction time in younger adults (NC = 4, pc > 0.05, 98.75% CI) reward index of recall precision in older adults (NC = 4, pc > 0.05, 98.75% CI), and reward index of reaction time in older adults (NC = 4, pc > 0.05, 98.75% CI). None of the tested correlations were significant. BIS, BAS, NO and df correspond to Behavioral Inhibition System, Behavioral Activation System, number of bivariate outliers and degrees of freedom, respectively.

From: The influence of anticipated monetary incentives on visual working memory performance in healthy younger and older adults

  

BIS

BAS Drive

BAS Fun Seeking

BAS Reward Responsiveness

Younger adults, reward index of recall precision

NO

1

0

1

3

df

71

72

71

69

rs

−0.106

−0.077

0.121

0.038

CI

[−0.366, 0.170]

[−0.368, 0.210]

[−0.206, 0.396]

[−0.273, 0.349]

Younger adults, reward index of reaction time

NO

0

0

5

0

df

72

72

67

72

rs

−0.163

0.003

0.026

−0.031

CI

[−0.463, 0.115]

[−0.272, 0.313]

[−0.250, 0.337]

[−0.309, 0.265]

Older adults, reward index of recall precision

NO

3

0

0

1

df

65

68

68

67

rs

0.029

−0.033

−0.169

−0.121

CI

[−0.282, 0.336]

[−0.361, 0.275]

[−0.440, 0.110]

[−0.419, 0.194]

Older adults, reward index of reaction time

NO

3

5

0

1

df

65

63

68

67

rs

0.011

0.129

−0.090

0.038

CI

[−0.299, 0.327]

[−0.222, 0.439]

[−0.407, 0.225]

[−0.302, 0.370]