Table 4 Comparison between the compartmental data from numerical simulations and physical experiments.

From: Numerical evaluation of spray position for improved nasal drug delivery

 

Pearson’s rank correlation in NPM1

Pearson’s rank correlation in NPM2

Reference (Zero shift)

Zero shift CI

−Shift

−Shift CI

+Shift

+Shift CI

Mean

Reference (Zero shift)

Zero shift CI

−Shift

−Shift CI

+Shift

+Shift CI

Mean

Sagittal columns

0.96

(0.61, 0.99)

0.85

(0.75, 1.00)

0.97

(0.79, 1.00)

0.93

0.98

(0.94, 1.00)

0.85

(0.75, 1.00)

0.97

(0.80, 1.00)

0.93

Sagittal rows

0.95

(0.49, 0.99)

0.71

(0.48, 1.00)

0.91

(0.67, 1.00)

0.86

0.88

(0.75, 1.00)

0.71

(0.55, 1.00)

0.91

(0.70, 1.00)

0.83

Front columns

0.95

(0.89, 1.00)

0.93

(0.90, 1.00)

0.96

(0.40, 1.00)

0.95

0.96

(0.93, 1.00)

0.93

(0.90, 1.00)

0.96

(0.42, 1.00)

0.95

 

Kendall’s rank correlation in NPM1

Kendall’s rank correlation in NPM2

Reference (Zero shift)

Zero shift CI

Shift

Shift CI

+Shift

+Shift CI

Mean

Reference (Zero shift)

Zero shift CI

Shift

Shift CI

+Shift

+Shift CI

Mean

Sagittal columns

0.71

(0.32, 0.95)

0.79

(0.52, 0.97)

0.91

(0.67, 1.00)

0.80

0.78

(0.41, 1.00)

0.79

(0.54, 0.97)

0.91

(0.68, 1.00)

0.83

Sagittal rows

0.60

(0.11, 0.94)

0.79

(0.56, 0.96)

0.85

(0.53, 0.98)

0.75

0.64

(0.23, 0.93)

0.79

(0.56, 0.96)

0.85

(0.53, 1.00)

0.76

Front columns

0.78

(0.34, 0.97)

0.85

(0.63, 0.99)

0.73

(0.41, 0.97)

0.79

0.72

(0.35, 0.96)

0.85

(0.63, 0.99)

0.73

(0.41, 0.97)

0.77

  1. Note: + Shift = positive 1 pixel shift from reference, −Shift = negative 1 pixel shift from reference.