Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58126-z, published online 12 March 2020

This article contains an error in the Discussion section.

“In this study, the survival of transplanted iPSC-CMs was prolonged; however, the number of engrafted cells was less than 10% on the 15th day in the iPSC-CM with MSC group. One limitation of this study was that we did not label MSCs, but the reason as to why engraftment was not permanent might be partially attributed to a decrease in transplanted allogeneic MSCs due to immune rejection after the loss of their immunoprivilege. There are many merits associated with the use of allogeneic MSCs, and not syngeneic MSCs, considering clinical applications; allogeneic MSCs can be prepared well in advance, and are independent of the recipient’s condition including disease status and age57. However, allogeneic MSCs were found to be immunoprivileged early after implantation but gradually lost this phenotype57,58. Recently, methods to prolong the engraftment of allogeneic MSCs have also been reported and the further development of such methods might allow the long-term cell engraftment of allogeneic MSCs59,60.”

should read:

“There are many merits associated with the use of allogeneic MSCs, and not syngeneic MSCs, considering clinical applications; allogeneic MSCs can be prepared well in advance, and are independent of the recipient’s condition including disease status and age57. However, allogeneic MSCs were found to be immunoprivileged early after implantation but gradually lost this phenotype57,58. Recently, methods to prolong the engraftment of allogeneic MSCs have also been reported and the further development of such methods might allow the long-term cell engraftment of allogeneic MSCs59,60.”