Table 1 Comparison of diversity indices between the midgut and midgut contents.
Sample | Â | Chao | Shannon | Ace | Simpson |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A. pernyi midgut | _1 | 84.21 | 0.16 | 93.81 | 0.96 |
_2 | 213.00 | 1.37 | 205.73 | 0.45 | |
_3 | 136.05 | 0.42 | 147.67 | 0.87 | |
A. pernyi midgut contents | _2 | 38.20 | 0.45 | 69.28 | 0.78 |
_3 | 62.00 | 0.056 | 167.39 | 0.99 | |
B. mori midgut | _1 | 364.14 | 1.91 | 361.38 | 0.36 |
_2 | 393.90 | 2.21 | 384.03 | 0.29 | |
_3 | 390.59 | 2.26 | 388.08 | 0.34 | |
_4 | 395.38 | 2.43 | 390.16 | 0.23 | |
_5 | 389.36 | 2.05 | 384.06 | 0.29 | |
_6 | 399.15 | 2.275 | 392.61 | 0.25 | |
B. mori midgut contents | _1 | 191.87 | 1.05 | 194.74 | 0.45 |
_2 | 169.65 | 0.83 | 229.51 | 0.54 | |
_3 | 263.39 | 0.91 | 271.11 | 0.58 | |
_4 | 342.85 | 1.467 | 336.06 | 0.39 | |
_5 | 196.08 | 1.02 | 186.29 | 0.66 | |
_6 | 254.32 | 1.15 | 268.67 | 0.43 |