Table 2 Results of the cophenetic correlation coefficients (CCC) for comparing diversity matrices and clustering methods for phenotypic and molecular data in white Guinea yam.
 Dissimilarity matrices | Clustering methods | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ward.D2 | Single | Average (UPGMA) | Median | Mcquitty (WPGM) | Complete | |
Phenotypic data | ||||||
Gower | 0.58 | 0.67 | 0.91 | 0.61 | 0.80 | 0.78 |
Manhattan | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.88 |
Euclidean | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.81 | 0.86 | 0.87 |
Mahalanobis | 0.59 | 0.83 | 0.85 | 0.81 | 0.84 | 0.81 |
Genotypic data | ||||||
IBS | 0.80 | 0.87 | 0.91 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.88 |
Jaccard | 0.80 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.89 | 0.86 |
Nei | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
Roger | 0.81 | 0.87 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.88 |
Gower + IBS | 0.56 | 0.62 | 0.75 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.71 |