Table 4 Means (M) and standard errors (SE) for fronto-parietal coherence in the alpha frequency range per hemisphere (left, middle, right), group (programmers, non-programmers) and complexity level (low, medium, high) of each task (NIR, FIR, and VDR).

From: Programming experience associated with neural efficiency during figural reasoning

Ā 

Programmers

Non-Programmers

Ā 

Left

Middle

Right

Ā 

Left

Middle

Right

N

M (SE)

M (SE)

M (SE)

N

M (SE)

M (SE)

M (SE)

FIR

Low

19

0.038 (0.005)a

0.044 (0.009)b

0.044 (0.008)c

17

0.071 (0.011)a

0.073 (0.012)b

0.078 (0.012)c

Medium

19

0.059 (0.009)

0.074 (0.011)

0.076 (0.009)

17

0.081 (0.011)

0.094 (0.016)

0.092 (0.014)

High

19

0.062 (0.007)

0.077 (0.011)

0.077 (0.012)

17

0.074 (0.011)

0.093 (0.013)

0.087 (0.011)

NIR

Low

19

0.046 (0.010)

0.048 (0.008)

0.047 (0.008)

18

0.057 (0.009)

0.056 (0.010)

0.059 (0.012)

Medium

19

0.048 (0.013)

0.055 (0.012)

0.048 (0.010)

18

0.067 (0.016)

0.067 (0.015)

0.057 (0.015)

High

19

0.066 (0.010)

0.072 (0.012)

0.068 (0.014)

18

0.070 (0.010)

0.080 (0.013)

0.072 (0.011)

VDR

Low

20

0.078 (0.010)

0.079 (0.009)

0.073 (0.009)

21

0.071 (0.008)

0.076 (0.008)

0.067 (0.006)

Medium

20

0.067 (0.007)

0.072 (0.008)

0.072 (0.010)

21

0.086 (0.010)

0.091 (0.008)

0.086 (0.008)

High

20

0.089 (0.014)

0.097 (0.017)

0.087 (0.015)

21

0.129 (0.019)

0.130 (0.019)

0.122 (0.021)

  1. FIR figural inductive reasoning, NIR numerical inductive reasoning, VDR verbal deductive reasoning. Superscripted letters indicate significant differences revealed by the post-hoc tests for the interaction effect Complexity*Group.