Table 2 In the cases of frequency detunings, where \(\omega - \omega_{c} = \kappa /2\) [QD1, QD2, and QD3] and \(\omega - \omega_{c} = 0\) [QD4 and QD5], the values of the reflection \(R_{{\text{h}}} \left( {R_{{0}} } \right)\), noise \(N_{{\text{h}}}\), and leakage \(S_{{\text{h}}} \left( {S_{{0}} } \right)\) coefficients in hot (cold) cavity were calculated for the differences in the side-leakage rate \(\kappa_{s} {/}\kappa\) and the coupling strength \(g{/}\kappa\), with fixed parameters \(\gamma {/}\kappa = 0.1\) and \(\omega_{{{\text{X}}^{ - } }} = \omega_{c}\).
\(\omega - \omega_{c}\) | \(\gamma /\kappa = 0.1\) | Reflection, noise, and leakage coefficients | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hot cavity | Cold cavity | ||||||
\(g/\kappa\) | \(\kappa_{s} /\kappa\) | \(R_{{\text{h}}} \left( \omega \right)\) | \(N_{{\text{h}}} \left( \omega \right)\) | \(S_{{\text{h}}} \left( \omega \right)\) | \(R_{{0}} \left( \omega \right)\) | \(S_{{0}} \left( \omega \right)\) | |
\(\kappa /2\) | 2.4 | 0.01 | 0.99 + 0.09i | 0.14 + 0.01i | 0.00 + 0.01i | 0.00–0.99i | − 0.10–0.10i |
1.00 | 0.98 + 0.09i | 0.14 + 0.01i | − 0.02 + 0.09i | 0.20–0.40i | − 0.80–0.40i | ||
2.00 | 0.98 + 0.09i | 0.13 + 0.02i | − 0.03 + 0.12i | 0.40–0.20i | − 0.85–0.28i | ||
0.1 | 0.01 | − 0.04–0.98i | − 0.05 + 0.07i | − 0.10–0.10i | 0.00–0.99i | − 0.10–0.10i | |
1.00 | 0.19–0.39i | − 0.02 + 0.05i | − 0.81–0.39i | 0.20–0.40i | − 0.80–0.40i | ||
2.00 | 0.40–0.19i | − 0.01 + 0.04i | − 0.85–0.27i | 0.40–0.20i | − 0.85–0.28i | ||
\(0\) | 2.4 | 0.01 | 0.9914 | 0.1312 | − 0.0008 | − 0.9802 | − 0.1980 |
1.00 | 0.9914 | 0.1306 | − 0.0086 | 0.0000 | − 1.0000 | ||
2.00 | 0.9914 | 0.1301 | − 0.0121 | 0.3333 | − 0.9428 | ||
0.1 | 0.01 | − 0.4184 | 0.8971 | − 0.1418 | − 0.9802 | − 0.1980 | |
1.00 | 0.1667 | 0.5270 | − 0.8333 | 0.0000 | − 1.0000 | ||
2.00 | 0.4118 | 0.3720 | − 0.8319 | 0.3333 | − 0.9428 |