Table 2 Topographic features and characteristics of dis hemorrhage.

From: Development of a nomogram using fundus photography to predict glaucoma progression in patients showing disc hemorrhage

 

Glaucoma with disc hemorrhage

P-value

Progression group

(n = 43 eyes)

Non-progression group

(n = 35 eyes)

DH recurrence (%)

7 (16.3%)

8 (22.97%)

0.463

Bilaterality of DH (%)

8 (18.6%)

2 (5.7%)

0.090

Angular extent of DH (degrees)

10.37 (6.88, 15.37)

12.14 (7.40, 15.06)

0.234

Proximal location of DH (%)

  

0.008

Parapapillary

9 (20.9%)

19 (54.2%)

 

Peripapillary

25 (58.1%)

13 (37.2%)

 

Neuroretinal rim

9 (20.9%)

3 (8.5%)

 

DH location with RNFLD (%)

  

0.001

Without RNFLD

3 (6.9%)

16 (45.7%)

 

Within RNFLD

5 (11.6%)

6 (17.1%)

 

Border of RNFLD

35 (81.4%)

13 (37.1%)

 

Octant location of DH (%)

  

0.355

Superotemporal-superior

9 (20.9%)

10 (28.6%)

 

Superotemporal-inferior

1 (2.3%)

3 (8.6%)

 

Inferotemporal-superior

7 (16.3%)

5 (14.3%)

 

Inferotemporal-inferior

25 (58.1%)

14 (40.0%)

 

Inferonasal-inferior

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.9%)

 

Inferonasal-superior

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.9%)

 

Superonasal-inferior

1 (2.3%)

0 (0.0%)

 

Superonasal-superior

0 (0.0%)

1 (2.9%)

 
  1. Data are presented as a median (first, third quartiles).
  2. Data are presented as the number of patients (%) for categorical variables.
  3. Comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U-test for continuous variables.
  4. Comparisons were performed using the chi-square test for categorical variables.
  5. DH disc hemorrhage, RNFLD retinal nerve fiber layer defect.
  6. P, comparison between two groups.