Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of the risks of late CRT with CGCD.

From: Early prophylaxis of central venous catheter-related thrombosis using 1% chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings: a retrospective cohort study

 

Late CRT

Unadjusted OR

p value

Adjusted OR

95% CI

p value

CGCD

0.65

.389

0.71

0.25–1.99

.514

Age

0.99

.442

0.99

0.96–1.03

.651

Sex (female)

0.31

.056

–

–

–

APACHE II score

0.95

.248

0.94

0.85–1.04

.216

Admission type (medical)

2.07

.181

–

–

–

Infection

3.17

.090

–

–

–

Malignancy

0.81

.718

–

–

–

Prophylactic anticoagulation

4.50

.014

–

–

–

CVC-exit site (left)

1.61

.344

–

–

–

CVC type (type Aa)

0.43

.097

0.40

0.14–1.13

.083

  1. APACHE II, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II; CGCD, 1% alcoholic chlorhexidine gluconate and chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressing; CI, confidence interval; CRT, catheter-related thrombosis; CVC, central venous catheter; OR, odds ratio.
  2. aType A was a poly (2-methoxyethylacrylate)-coated central venous catheter.
Back to article page