Table 1 Homozygote and heterozygote effects of SSSLs estimated on tiller numbers at various developmental stages.

SSSL	Effect	t1	t2	t3	t4	t5	t6	t7	t8	t9
S₁	a	− 0.06	0.22	− 0.11	− 1.33	− 2.08	− 2.00	− 2.17	− 2.00	− 1.08
S₁	d	0.78*	0.78	1.50*	− 0.17	− 1.67	− 1.00	− 1.67	− 1.08	− 0.25
S₂	a	0.50	0.94*	1.33*	1.42	0.08	0.50	0.25	− 0.08	− 0.17
S₂	d	1.33**	2.72**	3.81**	2.83*	1.00	− 0.54	0.17	0.00	0.04
S₃	a	0.17	0.28	0.39	0.42	0.25	1.75	1.75	2.17	1.75
S₃	d	0.39	0.83	1.44*	2.00	3.75*	4.42**	4.25**	4.25**	4.58**
S₄	a	0.00	0.06	0.22	0.00	0.25	1.67	1.08	1.00	1.08
S₄	d	0.61	1.44**	2.33**	0.67	− 0.58	− 0.25	− 0.67	− 0.83	− 0.67
S₅	a	0.06	0.22	0.50	0.42	0.42	0.83	0.92	0.67	1.00
S₅	d	0.94**	1.78**	2.22**	2.08	1.50	2.00	2.08	1.33	1.92
S₆	a	0.06	− 0.28	− 0.22	− 0.83	− 1.33	− 1.67	− 1.64	− 1.42	− 1.32
S₆	d	0.89*	1.17*	1.67*	0.67	0.08	− 0.17	− 0.17	− 0.25	0.00

SSSL was the abbreviation of single segment substitution line. S_i represented the code of SSSL_i. ti indicated various developmental stages, the difference of 7d. a and d were homozygote and heterozygote effects, respectively, estimated by \(SSSL_{i} - HJX74\)(where i represented homozygote or heterozygote). Sign “− ” meant to descend tiller number due to the alleles from donors. Superscripts “^* and ^**” indicated the significance at 5% and 1% level, respectively.

Quick links

Search