Table 1 Allometric model fits to DBH and fDBH derived from TLS, with the TLS-derived AGB used as reference.

Model	Slope	Intercept	\(\mathbf{r} ^{2}\)	RMSE (tons)	CV (%)
With Colonel Armstrong tree
Parks¹⁰	0.65	\(-\) 0.99	0.91	35.35	2.63
Fujimori²	0.78	\(-\) 1.84	0.90	43.62	3.24
Sillett et al.¹⁹	0.97	\(-\) 0.85	0.90	55.04	4.09
Sillett et al.⁸	0.66	\(-\) 0.46	0.91	34.42	2.56
Kizha and Han⁹	0.71	\(-\) 1.48	0.89	41.63	3.09
Jenkins et al.⁵²	0.61	\(-\) 1.26	0.89	35.66	2.65
Chojnacky et al.⁵³	0.71	\(-\) 2.16	0.89	43.08	3.20
Without Colonel Armstrong tree
Parks¹⁰	0.62	\(-\) 0.57	0.87	34.08	2.66
Fujimori²	0.72	\(-\) 1.16	0.86	40.84	3.19
Sillett et al.¹⁹	0.96	\(-\) 0.79	0.86	55.02	4.30
Sillett et al.⁸	0.64	\(-\) 0.23	0.87	34.04	2.66
Kizha and Han⁹	0.68	\(-\) 1.16	0.84	41.00	3.20
Jenkins et al.⁵²	0.58	\(-\) 0.99	0.84	35.13	2.74
Chojnacky et al.⁵³	0.67	\(-\) 1.65	0.83	41.58	3.25

Fits are across all plots with and without Colonel Armstrong Tree, species-specific allometry first, followed by generalised and including RMSE of model fit and coefficent of variation (CV %).

Quick links

Search