Table 2 Effect of P2Y12 inhibitors on frequencies of clinical outcomes in ACS patients.

From: Efficacy and safety of newer P2Y12 inhibitors for acute coronary syndrome: a network meta-analysis

 

Clopidogrel

Prasugrel

Ticagrelor

Cangrelor

Myocardial infarction

Clopidogrel

1.00

0.75 (0.63–0.89)

0.88 (0.72–1.08)

0.94 (0.78–1.13)

Prasugrel

1.33 (1.12–1.58)

1.00

1.17 (0.93–1.48)

1.25 (0.97–1.61)

Ticagrelor

1.13 (0.92–1.39)

0.85 (0.67–1.07)

1.00

1.06 (0.80–1.40)

Cangrelor

1.07 (0.88–1.29)

0.80 (0.62–1.04)

0.94 (0.71–1.24)

1.00

Stroke

Clopidogrel

1.00

0.96 (0.74–1.23)

1.10 (0.88–1.36)

1.08 (0.49–2.37)

Prasugrel

1.05 (0.81–1.35)

1.00

1.15 (0.85–1.55)

1.13 (0.49–2.59)

Ticagrelor

0.91(0.74–1.13)

0.87 (0.64–1.18)

1.00

0.98 (0.43–2.23)

Cangrelor

0.93 (0.42–2.05)

0.89 (0.39–2.04)

1.02 (0.45–2.31)

1.00

Cardiovascular mortality

Clopidogrel

1.00

0.85 (0.75–0.97)

0.82 (0.73–0.93)

1.00 (0.52–1.92)

Prasugrel

1.17 (1.03–1.34)

1.00

0.97 (0.83–1.13)

1.17 (0.60–2.29)

Ticagrelor

1.21 (1.08–1.37)

1.03 (0.89–1.21)

1.00

1.21 (0.62–2.36)

Cangrelor

1.00 (0.52–1.92)

0.85 (0.44–1.66)

0.82 (0.42–1.60)

1.00

MACE

Clopidogrel

1.00

0.80 (0.69–0.94)

0.89 (0.75–1.05)

0.90 (0.75–1.07)

Prasugrel

1.25 (1.07–1.46)

1.00

1.10 (0.91–1.34)

1.12 (0.88–1.42)

Ticagrelor

1.13 (0.95–1.34)

0.91 (0.75–1.10)

1.00

1.01 (0.79–1.30)

Cangrelor

1.12 (0.93–1.34)

0.89 (0.70–1.14)

0.99 (0.77–1.27)

1.00

Definite or probable stent thrombosis

Clopidogrel

1.00

0.49 (0.38–0.63)

0.72 (0.57–0.90)

0.59 (0.43–0.81)

Prasugrel

2.03 (1.58–2.62)

1.00

1.46 (1.08–1.97)

1.20 (0.80–1.81)

Ticagrelor

1.39 (1.12–1.74)

0.69 (0.51–0.93)

1.00

0.83 (0.56–1.22)

Cangrelor

1.69 (1.23–2.32)

0.83 (0.55–1.25)

1.21 (0.82–1.78)

1.00

All-cause mortality

Clopidogrel

1.00

0.91 (0.76–1.09)

0.88 (0.73–1.05)

0.75 (0.46–1.22)

Prasugrel

1.10 (0.92–1.32)

1.00

0.97 (0.78–1.20)

0.83 (0.50–1.38)

Ticagrelor

1.14 (0.95–1.37)

1.03 (0.83–1.28)

1.00

0.86 (0.51–1.43)

Cangrelor

1.33 (0.82–2.15)

1.21 (0.72–2.02)

1.17 (0.70–1.95)

1.00

  1. Results are the Odds Ratios (95% Confidence Interval) in the column-defining therapy compared with the Odds Ratios in the row-defining therapy. For efficacy and safety, Odds Ratio < 1 favors the column-defining therapy. Significant results are shown in bold.
  2. ACS acute coronary syndrome, MACE major cardiovascular events.