Table 4 Comparison of random effect models.
From: Negative binomial mixed models for analyzing longitudinal CD4 count data
Random effect models | Information criteria | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
− 2log \({ }\ell\) | AIC | AICC | BIC | CAIC | HQIC | |
Model 1 | 87,781.28 | 87,833.28 | 87,833.48 | 87,923.23 | 87,949.23 | 87,869.54 |
Model 2 | 88,603.50 | 88,649.50 | 88,649.66 | 88,729.07 | 88,752.07 | 88,681.58 |
Model 3 | 88,591.64 | 88,637.64 | 88,637.80 | 88,717.21 | 88,740.21 | 88,669.72 |
Model 4 | 89,156.39 | 89,202.39 | 89,202.55 | 89,281.96 | 89,304.96 | 89,234.47 |
Model 5 | 89,837.18 | 89,879.18 | 89,879.31 | 89,951.83 | 89,972.83 | 89,908.47 |
Model 6 | 92,302.08 | 92,344.08 | 92,344.21 | 92,416.73 | 92,437.73 | 92,373.37 |
Model 7 | 91,190.61 | 91,232.61 | 91,232.74 | 91,305.26 | 91,326.26 | 91,261.90 |
