Table 3 Population structure statistics. Global estimates of D, FST, FIS and G”ST for all SNPs for the tests of Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2.

From: The influence of anthropogenic habitat fragmentation on the genetic structure and diversity of the malaria vector Anopheles cruzii (Diptera: Culicidae)

Hypothesis

Area

Population structure

Statistics

Estimate

Non-corrected P value

Corrected P value

Hypothesis 1

All areas

D

0.000229923

0.6183816

0.848255

FST

 − 0.000702856

0.8941059

0.895105

FIS

 − 0.000989916

0.8951049

0.895105

G''ST

0.02421096

0.8941059

0.895105

Hypothesis 2

Natural

D

0.000526055

0.7582418

0.863137

FST

3.46145E − 05

0.4335664

0.846953

FIS

4.7792E − 05

0.4335664

0.846953

G''ST

0.06047334

0.4285714

0.846953

Suburban/rural

D

0.000759986

0.3396603

0.846953

FST

0.000353953

0.3876124

0.846953

FIS

0.000509479

0.3876124

0.846953

G''ST

0.07533064

0.5314685

0.848255

Urban

D

0.001501095

0.008991009

0.210646

FST

0.004968052

0.040959041

0.210646

FIS

0.007001884

0.040959041

0.210646

G''ST

0.1256977

0.065934066

0.296703

  1. Statistically significant P values (> 0.05) are shown in bold. Hypothesis 1: Comparison of tree-canopy (70) and ground-level (75) Anopheles cruzii populations from all areas. Hypothesis 2: comparison of Anopheles cruzii populations from tree canopy and ground level separated by area classified according to the degree of anthropogenic modification (Natural: 30/30, suburban/rural: 22/30 and urban: 18/15).
Back to article page