Table 2 Comparison of patient demographics between patients with high ATPD (≥ 44 HU) and those with low ATPD (< 44 HU).

From: Myosteatosis as a novel prognostic biomarker after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

 

High ATPD

Low ATPD

P value

No. pts

110

120

 

Age, years

71 (63–77)

75 (70–79)

 < 0.01

Male, n (%)

99 (90)

85 (71)

 < 0.01

BMI, kg/m2

21.5 (18.8–23.6)

22.7 (20.7–25.2)

 < 0.01

ECOG PS ≥ 1, n (%)

12 (11)

28 (23)

0.01

CCI ≥ 1, n (%)

46 (42)

59 (50)

0.23

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio

2.1 (1.5–3.3)

2.2 (1.6–3.0)

0.86

Serum albumin, g/dL

4.0 (3.6–4.3)

3.9 (3.6–4.2)

0.17

Psoas muscle index, cm2/m2

4.9 (3.8–5.7)

4.2 (3.3–5.4)

0.01

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, n (%)

27 (25)

38 (32)

0.22

Cystectomy approach, n (%)

  

0.49

Open

88 (80)

101 (84)

 

Laparoscopic

11 (10)

12 (10)

 

Robotic

11 (10)

7 (6)

 

Urinary diversion, n (%)

  

 < 0.01

Cutaneous ureterostomy

39 (35)

52 (43)

 

Ileal conduit

54 (49)

64 (53)

 

Neobladder

17 (15)

4 (3)

 

Pathological diagnosis, n (%)

  

0.98

UC

100 (91)

109 (91)

 

Non-UC

10 (9)

11 (9)

 

Pathological T stage, n (%)

  

0.16

pT0-T2

73 (66)

69 (58)

 

pT3-T4

37 (34)

51 (43)

 

Lymph node metastasis

  

0.89

pN negative

90 (82)

99 (83)

 

pN positive

20 (18)

21 (18)

 

CIS concurrent

  

0.14

Yes

28 (25)

21 (18)

 

No

82 (75)

99 (83)

 
  1. *Continuous variables are shown in “median (quartile)” form.