Table 2 Number and percentage of mosquitoes caught by species and by sex with two types of trapping devices.
From: Field evaluation of two mosquito traps in Zhejiang Province, China
Species | BGM trap | CDC light trap | Sex ratio difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Count | Proportion (%) | Count | Proportion (%) | ||
Cx. pipiens s.l | |||||
Female | 1749 | 47.05% | 1903 | 52.28% | X2 = 69.263 |
Male | 325 | 8.74% | 659 | 16.73% | p < 2.2e−16 |
Cx. tritaeniorhynchus | |||||
Female | 157 | 4.22% | 906 | 24.89% | X2 = 3.794 |
Male | 10 | 0.27% | 110 | 3.05% | p = 0.0514 |
Ae. albopictus | |||||
Female | 993 | 26.72% | 57 | 1.57% | X2 = 1.1458 |
Male | 442 | 11.89% | 19 | 0.55% | p = 0.2844 |
An. sinensis | |||||
Female | 10 | 0.27% | 15 | 0.38% | NA |
Male | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.03% | |
Ar. subalbatus | |||||
Female | 31 | 0.83% | 19 | 0.52% | NA |
Male | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | |
Total | |||||
Female | 2940 | 79.10 | 2900 | 79.64 | X2 = 0.33578 |
Male | 777 | 20.90 | 789 | 20.36 | p = 0.5623 |
Total | 3717 | 100% | 3689 | 100% | Â |
