Table 4 Statistical differences of (a) numbers of mosquitoes per sampling period, (b) numbers of female mosquitoes per sampling period by species between two types of trapping devices.
From: Field evaluation of two mosquito traps in Zhejiang Province, China
Species | Method | Estimate | S.E. | t-value | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(a) | |||||
Cx. pipiens s.l | BG trap versus CDC trap | 0.07515 | 0.25658 | 0.293 | 1 |
Cx. tritaeniorhynchus | BG trap versus CDC trap | − 1.45339 | 0.45891 | − 3.167 | 0.0188 |
Ae. albopictus | BG trap versus CDC trap | 2.16439 | 0.35104 | 6.166 |  < 0.0010 |
An. sinensis | BG trap versus CDC trap | − 0.14678 | 0.57030 | − 0.257 | 1 |
Ar. subalbatus | BG trap versus CDC trap | 0.44874 | 0.45575 | 0.985 | 1 |
(b) | |||||
Cx. pipiens s.l | BG trap versus CDC trap | 0.56394 | 0.28113 | 2.006 | 0.679357 |
Cx. tritaeniorhynchus | BG trap versus CDC trap | − 1.20605 | 0.47850 | − 2.520 | 0.287196 |
Ae. albopictus | BG trap versus CDC trap | 2.15010 | 0.39352 | 5.363 | 2.69E–06 |
An. sinensis | BG trap versus CDC trap | 0.09139 | 1.05571 | 0.087 | 1 |
Ar. subalbatus | BG trap versus CDC trap | 0.90617 | 0.93322 | 0.971 | 1 |
