Table 1 The numbers and percentages of DM inpatients from 2002 to 2008.
From: Elucidate multidimensionality of type 1 diabetes mellitus heterogeneity by multifaceted information
Age group | T1D | T2D | Others | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
[1, 10) | 822 (80.75%) | 173 (16.99%) | 23 (2.26%) | 1018 (100%) |
[10, 20) | 1912 (59.34%) | 1262 (39.17%) | 48 (1.49%) | 3222 (100%) |
[20, 30) | 2088 (23.81%) | 6034 (68.80%) | 648 (7.39%) | 8770 (100%) |
[30, 40) | 1746 (6.87%) | 22,636 (89.07%) | 1032 (4.06%) | 25,414 (100%) |
[40, 50) | 1377 (1.88%) | 71,492 (97.37%) | 552 (0.75%) | 73,421 (100%) |
[50, 60) | 1214 (0.82%) | 145,947 (98.89%) | 424 (0.29%) | 147,585 (100%) |
[60, 70) | 1226 (0.65%) | 185,581 (99.03%) | 592 (0.32%) | 187,399 (100%) |
[70, 80) | 1433 (0.69%) | 207,022 (98.98%) | 701 (0.34%) | 209,156 (100%) |
[80, 90) | 611 (0.65%) | 92,910 (99.04%) | 290 (0.31%) | 93,811 (100%) |
90+ | 61 (0.62%) | 9798 (99.10%) | 28 (0.28%) | 9887 (100%) |
Total | 12,490 (1.64%) | 742,855 (97.78%) | 4338 (0.57%) | 759,683 (100%) |