Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30943-3, published online 17 August 2018


The original version of this Article contained an error in the legend of Figure 4.


“*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs control. P < 0.05; P < 0.01 vs MS group.”


now reads:


“*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs control. P < 0.05; ††P < 0.01 vs MS group.”


The original Article has been corrected.