Table 5 Performance comparison of the proposed MTM with other states of arts (comparison is made based on the physical and electrical dimensions, resonance frequency, covering band and EMR).
References | Year | Dimension physical (mm × mm) electrical (λ × λ) | Resonance frequency (GHz) | Frequency band | EMR | Tunable property |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 35 × 35 0.21 λ × 0.21λ | 1.8 | L | 4.76 | No | |
2020 | 9 × 9 0.125λ × 0.125λ | 4.15, 10.84, 14.93 | C, X and Ku | 8.03 | No | |
2019 | 5 × 5 0.125λ × 0.125λ | 7.5 | C | 8 | No | |
2020 | 10 × 10 0.12λ × 0.12λ | 3.57,11.6 | S and X | 8.4 | No | |
2017 | 5 × 5 0.23λ × 0.23λ | 13.9, 27.5 | Ku and K | 4.4 | No | |
2018 | 20 × 20 0.77λ × 0.77λ | 11.5,13.5 | X and Ku | 1.4 | No | |
2017 | 25 × 25 0.23λ × 0.23λ | 2.8 | S | 4.28 | No | |
2021 | 10.3 × 10.3 0.59λ × 0.59λ | 17.1 | Ku | 1.7 | No | |
Proposed | 2021 | 10 × 10 0.14λ × 0.14λ | 4.2, 10.14, 13.15, 17.1 | C, X, Ku | 7.17 | Yes |
