Table 3 Comparison between suggested and existing work based on some aspects.
References | Published Year | Shape of the MTM Unit Cell | Unit Cell Size (mm2) | Frequency Bands | MTM types | EMR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | Concentric Crossed Line | 10 \(\times\) 10 | C-, X-, Ku- | SNG | 4.5 | |
2016 | Modified Z | 10 \(\times\) 10 | X- | DNG | 4 | |
2017 | Double C | 12 \(\times\) 12 | S-, C-, X- | DNG | 7.44 | |
2016 | Double Z-Shaped | 8.5 \(\times\) 8.5 | C-, X- | DNG | 4.8 | |
2019 | U-joint double split O | 15 \(\times\) 12 | X-, Ku- | DNG | 4.5 | |
2019 | Resistor Loaded Sector | 12.5 \(\times\) 12.5 | C-, X- | SNG | NR | |
2015 | S-Shaped | 12 \(\times\) 12 | X-, Ku- | SNG | 2.09 | |
2017 | Four-Fold Symmetric | 28.2 \(\times\) 28.2 | C- | SNG | NR | |
2019 | Nickel Concentrated | 25 \(\times\) 20 | X-, Ku- | DNG | NR | |
2020 | Hexagonal | 10 \(\times\) 10 | S-, X- | DNG | 8.4 | |
2018 | Modified H | 9 \(\times\) 9 | X-, Ku- | DNG | 3.0 | |
2017 | S-Shaped | 10 \(\times\) 10 | X- | SNG | 2.4 | |
2018 | Circular Sector | 9 \(\times\) 9 | C- | SNG | NR | |
2020 | Circular CSRR Shaped | 9 \(\times\) 9 | S-, C-, X- | SNG | 9.52 | |
This work | 2021 | Inverse double V-Shaped | 8 \(\times\) 8 | S-, C-, X- | DNG | 13.11 |
