Table 3 Comparison of DFT KS20, AT20, and IS20 between patients and controls and corresponding ROC analysis.
Mean KS20 (95% CI) | Mean AT20 (95% CI) | Median IS20 (IQR) | |
---|---|---|---|
PD (n = 55) | 55.0 (48.9, 61.1) | 195.6 (168.7, 222.5) | 4589 (1137, 13,464) |
Controls (n = 65) | 89.3 (85.6, 93.0) | 105.5 (97.5, 113.4) | 779.5 (357.7, 779.5) |
p value | < 0.001a | < 0.001a | < 0.001b |
KS20 Sensitivity | AT20 Sensitivity | IS20 Sensitivity | |
---|---|---|---|
Specificity—90% (cut-off) | 66.2% (82.5) | 58.5% (108.2) | 46.2% (717.6) |
Specificity—85% (cut-off) | 78.5% (80.5) | 67.7% (116.4) | 56.9% (853.4) |
Specificity—80% (cut-off) | 78.5% (78.5) | 76.9% (127.9) | 61.5% (957.3) |
Area under curve the ROC curve (95% CI) | 0.90 (0.85, 0.96) | 0.87 (0.81, 0.93) | 0.82 (0.74, 0.89) |