Table 4 Onset phase motor effects.

From: Mitochondrial function influences expression of methamphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization

Onset phase of responding to acute meth challenge

 

Two-way ANOVA

Between-time Post Hoc within operant treatments

Within-time Post Hoc between operant treatments

 

Saline/rotenone vs saline/rotenone

Meth/rotenone vs meth/rotenone

 

Saline/rotenone vs meth/rotenone

Horizontal beam breaks

Time: F(2, 43) = 11.8, p < 0.01

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 0.9, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 9.4, p < 0.01

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.01

p < 0.01

p < 0.01

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.01

R0

R14

R28

p \(<\) 0.01

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

Total distance traveled

Time: F(2, 43) = 1.4, p < 0.01

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 1.7, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 5.2, p < 0.01

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(<\) 0.01

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

Vertical beam breaks

Time: F(2, 43) = 0.4, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 8.9, p < 0.01

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 0.4, p \(\ge\) 0.5

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.05

p < 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

Vertical time

Time: F(2, 43) = 6.9, p < 0.01

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 0.9, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 0.2, p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.05

p < 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

Vertical movement number

Time: F(2, 43) = 16.2, p < 0.01

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 0.1, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 0.7, p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p < 0.05

p < 0.01

p < 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.01

p < 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

Stereotypy count

Time: F(2, 43) = 10.4, p < 0.01

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 0.01, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 5.6, p < 0.01

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.01

p < 0.05

p < 0.05

p < 0.05

p < 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(<\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

stereotypy time

Time: F(2, 43) = 7.4, p < 0.01

Treatment: F(1, 43) = 0.004, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 4.7, p < 0.05

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p < 0.01

p < 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

Stereotypy number

Time: F(2, 43) = 5.7, p < 0.01

Meth: F(1, 43) = 0.6, p \(\ge\) 0.05

Interaction: F(2, 43) = 1.7, p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0 vs R14

R0 vs R28

R14 vs R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

R0

R14

R28

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

p \(\ge\) 0.05

  1. Tested variables were rotenone administration time (Time) and operant-task treatment (Treatment). A Newman-Keuls was used for post-hoc comparisons.