Table 5 Training group: ROC correlation analysis and comparison of DP-ACLF and other prognostic scores.
Variable | AUC (95% CI) | St | Cut-off value | Sensitivity | Specificity | Positive likelihood ratio | Negative likelihood ratio | Accuracy | *z statistic (p value) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CTP | 0.601 (0.558–0.643) | 0.025 | 12 | 0.568 | 0.584 | 0.058 | 0.029 | 66.2% | 8.616 (p < 0.001) |
MELD | 0.706 (0.666–0.744) | 0.024 | 25 | 0.612 | 0.704 | 0.326 | 0.078 | 69.7% | 6.777 (p < 0.001) |
MELD-Na | 0.706 (0.666–0.744) | 0.023 | 28 | 0.623 | 0.724 | 0.376 | 0.122 | 68.2% | 6.363 (p < 0.001) |
CLIF-SOFA | 0.645 (0.603–0.685) | 0.024 | 8 | 0.628 | 0.601 | 0.181 | 0.047 | 68.4% | 8.174 (p < 0.001) |
CLIF-C ACLF | 0.651 (0.610–0.692) | 0.025 | 43 | 0.579 | 0.656 | 0.212 | 0.091 | 66.5% | 7.612 (p < 0.001) |
COSSH-ACLF | 0.644 (0.602–0.685) | 0.025 | 6 | 0.743 | 0.483 | 0.151 | 0.062 | 66.7% | 7.871 (p < 0.001) |
DP-ACLF | 0.850 (0.817–0.879) | 0.017 | 9.4 | 0.874 | 0.698 | 1.259 | 0.151 | 76.3% | NA |
