Table 2 Diagnostic performance of the best performing machine learning model in the training set and the test set.
Sequence | Feature selection | No. of selected features | Classification | Training set | Test set | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC (95% CI) | Accuracy (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | P-value* | AUC (95% CI) | Accuracy (95% CI) | Sensitivity (95% CI) | Specificity (95% CI) | P-value* | ||||
ADC | LASSO | 18 | SVM | 0.90 (0.84–0.95) | 80.5 (77.4–83.6) | 78.3 (64.2–92.4) | 82.9 (74.7–91.1) | Reference | 0.80 (0.65–0.95) | 78.0 (62.4–89.4) | 66.7 (41.0–86.7) | 87.0 (66.5–97.2) | Reference |
T2 | LASSO | 21 | SVM | 0.86 (0.80- 0.91) | 77.1 (74.1–80.1) | 80.7 (70.8–90.6) | 73.1 (66.0–80.2) | 0.346 | 0.65 (0.48–0.82) | 61.0 (44.5–75.8) | 44.4 (21.5–69.2) | 73.9 (51.6–89.9) | 0.186 |
T1C | MI | 30 | SVM | 0.91 (0.86–0.95) | 87.4 (84.5–90.3) | 90.7 (83.0–98.4) | 84.3 (78.2–90.4) | 0.798 | 0.66 (0.49–0.83) | 53.7 (37.4–69.3) | 11.1 (1.4–34.7) | 87.0 (66.4–97.2) | 0.217 |
ADC + T2 + T1C | LASSO | 35 | SVM | 0.93 (0.89–0.97) | 85.2 (82.0–88.4) | 79.8 (71.2–88.4) | 90.5 (83.0–98.0) | 0.405 | 0.66 (0.49–0.84) | 63.4 (46.9–77.9) | 38.9 (17.3–64.3) | 82.6 (61.2–95.0) | 0.217 |