Table 1 Comparison between subjects with Internet gaming addiction and healthy controls in probability discounting task.

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the clinical implications of probability discounting among individuals with Internet gaming disorder

Studies

IGD (N); CON (N)

Age

Edu (years)

Female (%)

Severity of IGD

Gaming duration (h/day)

Consecutive choices for each of probabilities

Probability options (%)

RT (ms); blank (ms); magnitude of first adjustment

Max. reward (USD)

Analysis

Country

Li et al.37

28; 28

21.09

15.86

58.90

6.07 (YDQ)

3.73

7

95, 75, 55, 25, 10, 5

NA; NA; half of the difference between guaranteed and risky choices

3654

AUC

China

Tian et al.38

42; 41

15.67

9.76

48.20

DSM-5

4.62

7

95, 75, 50, 30, 10, 5

NA; NA; one fourth

7307

AUC

China

Wang et al.29

42; 41

22.52

> 13

0.00

DSM-5

n/a

9

90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10

400; 500; NA

15

h value

China

Wang et al.39

18;20

21.45

14.52

0.00

DSM-5

n/a

9

90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10

400; 500; NA

15

h value

China

Wang et al.40

20; 20

21.73

> 13

0.00

DSM-5

2.89

9

90, 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30, 20, 10

400; 500; NA

15

h value

China

  1. AUC, area under the curve; CON, control group; DSM-5, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition; Edu, duration of education from primary school onward; IGD, Internet gaming disorder; N, number of subjects; NA, not available; RT, reaction Time; YDQ, Young’s diagnostic questionnaire for Internet addiction; YIAT, Young’s Internet addiction test.