Table 3 The performance comparison of four methods on three datasets under CV2.
Datasets | Methods | Sensitivity | Specificity | F1 score | Accuracy | AUC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dataset 1 | NGRHMDA | 0.6435 | 0.6719 | 0.0850 | 0.6713 | 0.8329 |
SMiR-NBI | 0.8510 | 0.1917 | 0.0393 | 0.2064 | 0.6021 | |
LRLSHMDA | 0.7938 | 0.5773 | 0.1122 | 0.5820 | 0.8249 | |
VDA-RWR | 0.5070 | 0.8932 | 0.1294 | 0.8846 | 0.9182 | |
Dataset 2 | NGRHMDA | 0.4867 | 0.8027 | 0.0719 | 0.7967 | 0.8017 |
SMiR-NBI | 0.9971 | 0.0929 | 0.0404 | 0.1098 | 0.7205 | |
LRLSHMDA | 0.7720 | 0.4166 | 0.0639 | 0.4232 | 0.7334 | |
VDA-RWR | 0.5045 | 0.7981 | 0.0814 | 0.7926 | 0.8025 | |
Dataset 3 | NGRHMDA | 0.4579 | 0.6785 | 0.0279 | 0.6758 | 0.6772 |
SMiR-NBI | 0.9751 | 0.0434 | 0.0243 | 0.0549 | 0.5665 | |
LRLSHMDA | 0.7420 | 0.5264 | 0.0493 | 0.5290 | 0.7468 | |
VDA-RWR | 0.5054 | 0.8098 | 0.0628 | 0.8061 | 0.8168 |