Table 2 Comparison of visceral fat depth, subcutaneous fat depth, and early pregnancy BMI between groups defined by demographic and clinical parameters.

From: Associations of ultrasound estimated early mid pregnancy visceral and subcutaneous fat depths and early pregnancy BMI with adverse neonatal outcomes

 

Visceral fat depth (mm)

Subcutaneous fat depth (mm)

BMI (kg/m2)

Demographic variables

n

%

Mean (± SD)

P

Mean (± SD)

P

Mean (± SD)

P

Smoking status at first antenatal visita

No

2672

3.6

44.4 (16.3)

0.433

17.1 (7.6)

0.011

25.1 (5.0)

0.045

Yes

99

96.4

45.7 (16.0)

 

19.1 (8.9)

 

26.4 (6.5)

 

Maternal country of birth

EU

2399

86.6

43.9 (16.2)

 < 0.001

17.2 (7.7)

0.795

25.2 (5.0)

0.382

Outside EU

372

13.4

47.9 (16.1)

 

17.1 (7.2)

 

24.9 (5.0)

 

Parity

Nulliparous

1185

42.8

43.4 (15.6)

0.002

18.2 (7.6)

 < 0.001

24.8 (4.9)

 < 0.001

Parous

1586

57.2

45.2 (16.7)

 

16.5 (7.6)

 

25.4 (5.1)

 
  1. Data were analyzed using t-tests. Significant results are in bold.
  2. aAfter imputation of data on smoking status.
  3. BMI, body mass index.