Table 7 Model (5) parameter estimation.
From: Analysis of residents’ food safety satisfaction from the perspective of income heterogeneity
βi | Std. error | Wald | EXP (βi) | 95%confidence limits | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||
Threshold | ||||||
Y = 1 Quite satisfied | 2.523*** | 0.129 | 383.323 | – | 2.271 | 2.776 |
= 2 Relatively satisfied | 4.092*** | 0.135 | 919.352 | – | 3.828 | 4.357 |
= 3 Average (= other is control group) | 6.973*** | 0.149 | 2199.411 | – | 6.682 | 7.265 |
Location | ||||||
X1 Supervision | 1.146*** | 0.031 | 1408.621 | 3.15 | 1.086 | 1.206 |
X2 publicity | 0.112*** | 0.032 | 11.961 | 1.12 | 0.049 | 0.176 |
X3 punishment intensity | 0.334*** | 0.033 | 105.204 | 1.40 | 0.27 | 0.397 |
X4 Special rectification | − 0.068** | 0.032 | 4.37 | 0.93 | − 0.131 | − 0.004 |
X5 complaint settlement | 0.188*** | 0.024 | 63.224 | 1.21 | 0.142 | 0.235 |
X6 Attention | − 0.028 | 0.025 | 1.275 | 0.97 | − 0.078 | 0.021 |
X7 Income level | 0.059** | 0.027 | 4.715 | 1.06 | 0.006 | 0.112 |
X8 Gender 1 = Male (female is control group) | − 0.249*** | 0.045 | 30.411 | 0.78 | − 0.338 | − 0.161 |
X9 Age 1 = 16–30 | − 0.403*** | 0.062 | 41.842 | 0.67 | − 0.525 | − 0.281 |
2 = 31–45 (other is control group) | − 0.111** | 0.056 | 3.947 | 0.89 | − 0.221 | − 0.001 |
X10 Residential area 1 = urban (other is control group) | 0.157*** | 0.062 | 6.301 | 1.17 | 0.034 | 0.279 |
X11 Occupation1 = enterprises and employees | − 0.156** | 0.073 | 4.533 | 0.86 | − 0.299 | − 0.012 |
2 = Technicians | − 0.225 | 0.144 | 2.431 | 0.80 | − 0.507 | 0.058 |
3 = Rural migrant workers in cities | − 0.262*** | 0.085 | 9.42 | 0.77 | − 0.429 | − 0.095 |
4 = Service workers (other is control group) | − 0.108 | 0.075 | 2.085 | 0.90 | − 0.255 | 0.039 |
X12 Education 1 = Senior college and above | 0.322*** | 0.077 | 17.67 | 1.38 | 0.172 | 0.473 |
2 = Junior college | 0.213*** | 0.068 | 9.742 | 1.24 | 0.079 | 0.347 |
3 = Senior high school (other is control group) | 0.201*** | 0.069 | 8.605 | 1.22 | 0.067 | 0.335 |
Only intercept finally | -2 Log likelihood value | Chi-square | Pseudo R-squared | |||
20,517.431 | – | Cox & Snell | 0.432 | |||
15,989.39 | 4528.041*** | Nagelkerke | 0.466 | |||
McFadden | 0.215 | |||||