Table 1 Summary of the estimated coefficients (with 95% HDIs) of the polynomial for the choice and no-choice conditions, along with the estimated difference (95% HDI) between conditions for Experiment 1. Coefficients are standardized to make the scales comparable—raw coefficients can be obtained by dividing \(b_n\) by the standard deviation of the time points for the corresponding term, \(SD(t^ {\circ n})\) with \(t = [3,6,9,12,18,30,45]\) (where \(t^{\circ n}\) is element-wise power function, raising the values in t to the nth power) . Differences between choice and no-choice conditions that exclude zero are highlighted in bold.

From: Temporal oscillations in preference strength provide evidence for an open system model of constructed preference

Polynomial coefficient

No choice

Choice

Difference

Intercept (\(b_0\))

17.06 [14.82, 19.04]

16.59 [14.72, 18.21]

0.47 [0.06, 0.83]

Slope (\(b_1\))

9.33 [0.90, 18.05]

9.33 [2.71, 16.10]

\(-0.00\) [\(-1.95\), 1.96]

Quadratic (\(b_2\))

\(-39.90\) [\(-67.24\), \(-0.74\)]

\(-31.84\) [\(-51.86\), \(-7.39\)]

\(-7.98\) [\(-15.88\), 2.22]

Cubic (\(b_3\))

36.97 [10.08, 61.51]

23.53 [5.04, 40.67]

13.34 [4.81, 21.41]

Quartic (\(b_4\))

30.23 [3.64, 51.65]

27.80 [4.25, 46.80]

2.58 [\(-0.61\), 4.86]

Quintic (\(b_5\))

\(-36.73\) [\(-58.84, -8.51\)]

\(-28.90\) [\(-47.44, -5.77\)]

\({\mathbf {-7.82}} {\mathbf {[-11.74, -2.54]}}\)