Table 1 Relationship between DII and urinary incontinence in the unadjusted, minimally adjusted and fully adjusted logistic regression models.
Quartile of DII | P value for trend | DII (continuous) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
− 4.81 to 0.61 | 0.61–2.11 | 2.11–3.27 | 3.27–5.33 | |||
UUI (OR, 95%CI, P) | ||||||
Model1 | Ref | 1.06 (0.95, 1.18) 0.328 | 1.08 (0.96, 1.21) 0.187 | 1.11 (1.00, 1.25) 0.06 | 0.055 | 1.02 (1.00, 1.04) 0.094 |
Model2 | Ref | 1.17 (1.04, 1.32) 0.010 | 1.31 (1.15, 1.48) < 0.001 | 1.53 (1.33, 1.76) < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 1.08 (1.06, 1.11) < 0.001 |
Model3 | Ref | 1.07 (0.94, 1.20) 0.308 | 1.13 (0.99, 1.28) 0.066 | 1.24 (1.07, 1.44) 0.003 | 0.004 | 1.04 (1.01, 1.06) 0.017 |
SUI (OR, 95%CI, P) | ||||||
Model1 | Ref | 0.98 (0.89, 1.08) 0.62 | 0.94 (0.85, 1.04) 0.232 | 0.82 (0.74, 0.91) < 0.001 | 0.002 | 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) 0.001 |
Model2 | Ref | 1.15 (1.04, 1.28) 0.009 | 1.26 (1.13, 1.41) < 0.001 | 1.30 (1.14, 1.47) < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 1.07 (1.04, 1.09) < 0.001 |
Model3 | Ref | 1.08 (0.97, 1.21) 0.138 | 1.15 (1.02, 1.28) 0.019 | 1.14 (1.00, 1.30) 0.05 | 0.021 | 1.03 (1.01, 1.06) 0.011 |
MUI (OR, 95%CI, P) | ||||||
Model1 | Ref | 1.02 (0.90, 1.17) 0.732 | 1.05 (0.92, 1.20) 0.474 | 1.03 (0.90, 1.18) 0.660 | 0.565 | 1.01 (0.98, 1.03) 0.540 |
Model2 | Ref | 1.20 (1.05, 1.39) 0.01 | 1.39 (1.20, 1.61) < 0.001 | 1.57 (1.34, 1.85) < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 1.10 (1.07, 1.14) < 0.001 |
Model3 | Ref | 1.08 (0.93, 1.24) 0.318 | 1.16 (1.00, 1.35) 0.056 | 1.20 (1.02, 1.43) 0.033 | 0.022 | 1.04 (1.00, 1.07) 0.034 |