Table 1 Characteristics of the studies included in the overall analysis.

From: Comparison of efficacy and safety of various management options for large upper ureteric stones a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Author year country

Treatment group (n)

Age (years)

Sex (M/F)

Stone size (mm)

Type of ESWL device

Sheath size for PNL (French)

PNL

URS

Follow up (months)

Modality for follow up

Impaction

Modality for measuring stone size

Lopes-Neto 2012 Brazil

A-SWL(14)

B-URS (16)

C-LUL (15)

A-46

B-49.6

C-46

A-7/7

B-10/6

C-9/6

A-13.8

B-14.4

C-15.9

Dormeir compact delta S

Standard

Semirigid

2

X-ray KUB

CT KUB

A-7.8%

B-6.8%

C-12.6%

NCCT KUB

Karami 2013 Iran

A-PNL (40)

B-LUL (40)

A-39.4

B-35.2

A-28/12

B-24/16

A-14.2

B-13.5

NA

28–30

Standard

Rigid

6

USG KUB

IVP

IVP

Lee 2006 China

A-SWL(22)

B-URS (20)

A-54.2 ± 16.7

B-48.5 ± 13.3

A-19/3

B-16/4

A-17.9 ± 3.9

B-18.5 ± 2.9

Siemen AG Lithostar 2 Lithotripter

NA

NA

NA

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

IVP

IVP

Sun 2008 China

A-PNL(44)

B-URS (47)

A-40.4 ± 8.4

B-39.6 ± 7.3

A-30/14

B-31/16

A-14.7 ± 2

B-14.6 ± 1.8

NA

14–16

Mini-PNL

Rigid

NA

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

All

IVP

Wang 2017 China

A-URS (50)

B-PNL(50)

C-LUL(50)

A-42 ± 14

B-41 ± 15

C-44 ± 11

A-28/22

B-31/19

C-29/21

A-16.8 ± 2.1

B-19.3 ± 1.8

C-18.8 ± 1.4

NA

18

Mini-PNL

Rigid

12

X-ray KUB

All

Xray KUB

Gu 2012 China

A-PNL(30

B-URS (29)

A-42.5 ± 10.1

B-44.22 ± 13

A-1:0.81

B-1:0.64

A-17.3

B-16.2

NA

A-12–18

B-8.5/9.8

Mini-PNL

Semirigid

3

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

All

Xray KUB/USG/NCCT

Yang 2012 China

A-PNL (91)

B-URS (91)

A-45.2 ± 14.7

B-46.4 ± 15.1

A-53/38

B-54/37

A-17.9

B-15.8

NA

A-16

B-8/9.8

Mini-PNL

Rigid

12

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

All

IVP

Ozturk 2013 Turkey

A-SWL (52)

B- LUL (51)

C- URS (48)

A-40.7

B-40.0

C-41.1

A-33/19

B-21/30

C-30/18

A-13.2 ± 2.04

B-13.3 ± 2.06

C-13.2 ± 2.01

Electrohydraulic extracorporeal Lithotripter (Multimed Classic)

Flexible

3

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

Basiri 2008 Iran

A- URS (50)

B- LUL (50)

C- PNL (50)

A-39 ± 15

B-44 ± 13

C-48 ± 13

A-33/17

B-36/14

C-32/18

A-17.8 \(\pm\) 2.4

A-22.4 \(\pm\) 3.2

C-20.3 \(\pm\) 3.3

Standard

Semirigid

3

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

A-24

B-27

C-25

IVP

Fang 2012 China

A-URS (25)

B—LUL(25)

A -36.9 ± 11.8

B-34.4 ± 9.8

A-15/10

B-14/11

A-15 ± 4

B-16 ± 3

Rigid

 

X-ray KUB

NCCT KUB

Shao 2015 China

A –URS (139)

B-LUL (136)

A-41

B-40

A-90/49

B-92/44

A-13.6 \(\pm\) 1.4

B-13.8 \(\pm\) 1.9

Semirigid

A-20

B-20.5

NA

All

IVP/CT Urogram

Kumar 2015 India

A- LUL(50)

B- URS (50)

A-36.7 ± 2.4

B-35.6 ± 2.1

A-24/26

B-26/24

A- 23 ± 2

B -22 ± 1

Semirigid

3

CT KUB

NCCT KUB

Kadyan 2016 India

A-URS (60)

B-LUL (62)

A-44.3 \(\pm 3.2\)

B-42.1 \(\pm 2.7\)

A-38/22

B-37/25

A-16.8 \(\pm\) 1.5

B-17.2 \(\pm\) 1.9

NA

NA

NA

Semirigid

0.75

X-ray KUB

USG KUB

  1. PNL, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy; URS, Uretero Renoscopic Lithotripsy; LUL, Laparoscopic Ureter lithotomy; SWL, Shock Wave Lithotripsy; KUB, Kidney Ureter Bladder; IVP, Intravenous Pyelography; CT, Computed Tomogram; USG, Ultra Sonography; NCCT, Non Contrast tomogram.