Table 4 Subgroup analysis of the effect of drug switching strategies on the occurrence of the primary efficacy and safety endpoints.

From: Efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Taiwan

 

Primary efficacy endpoint

All-cause mortality

AMI

Stroke

Ischemic Stroke

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

Clopidogrel without switching

1

 

1

 

1

 

1

   

Ticagrelor without switching

0.96 (0.71–1.29)

0.770

0.71 (0.45–1.12)

0.145

1.36 (0.90–2.07)

0.146

0.41 (0.17–0.98)

0.044

0.38 (0.15–0.97)

0.043

From none/ticagrelor switching to clopidogrel

1.68 (1.10–2.57)

0.017

0.92 (0.45–1.89)

0.817

2.62 (1.53–4.48)

0.000

0.57 (0.13–2.49)

0.453

0.68 (0.15–3.00)

0.609

From none/clopidogrel switching to ticagrelor

1.23 (0.84–1.80)

0.283

1.00 (0.56–1.76)

0.989

2.02 (1.24–3.28)

0.005

0.43 (0.12–1.46)

0.176

0.47 (0.14–1.63)

0.233

 

Primary safety endpoint

Major GI bleeding

      

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

Adjusted HR (95%CI)

p-value

      

Clopidogrel without switching

1

 

1

       

Ticagrelor without switching

0.57 (0.25–1.34)

0.197

0.52 (0.21–1.28)

0.153

      

From none/ticagrelor switching to clopidogrel

0.90 (0.25–3.18)

0.865

0.61 (0.13–2.78)

0.520

      

From none/clopidogrel switching to ticagrelor

0.86 (0.31–2.39)

0.770

0.94 (0.33–2.66)

0.909