Table 8 Abstract > concrete words—visual stimuli- clusters.

From: An ALE meta-analytical review of the neural correlates of abstract and concrete words

H

Cluster

Macroanatomical location

Cytoarchitectonic label

Weighted Center (MNI; mm)

Vol. (mm3)

Peaks: MNI coordinates (mm)

ALE score

Z score

No

Contributors to cluster

Lobe

Gyrus

x

y

z

x

y

z

Studies

L

1

Frontal,

temporal

Inferior frontal,

superior temporal

BA 47, BA 45,

BA 38

− 50.7

21.7

− 3.5

6992

− 52

24

4

0.029

6.440

12

Perani, 1999 (2); Fiebach, 2004 (1); Sabsevitz, 2005 (3); Binder, 2005 (5); Fliessbach, 2006 (2); Pexman, 2007 (1); Rodríguez-Ferreiro, 2011 (2); Hayashi, 2014 (1); Hoffman, 2015 (3); Skipper, 2014 (2); Wang, 2019 (1); Pauligk, 2019 (2)**

− 48

20

− 10

0.025

5.900

− 54

8

− 18

0.016

4.403

L

2

Temporal

Middle temporal

BA 22, BA 21

− 60.4

− 44.5

− 1.7

1160

− 60

− 42

− 6

0.016

4.425

5

Noppeney, 2004 (1); Sabsevitz, 2005 (1); Pexman, 2007 (2); Rodríguez-Ferreiro, 2011 (2); Wang, 2019 (1)**

− 60

− 48

4

0.015

4.273

L

3

Temporal

Superior temporal

BA 22, BA 21

− 49.5

− 27.5

− 2.6

904

− 50

− 28

− 4

0.016

4.407

4

Sabsevitz, 2005 (1); Hoffman, 2015 (2); Kumar, 2016 (1); Wang, 2019 (1)**

  1. Included 135 stereotactic activation loci from 22 studies, 374 participants, chosen min. cluster size 688 mm3.
  2. All the values and labels were extracted from the GingerALE output files. Clusters are ordered for decreasing volume size. Coordinates (x, y, z) are in the MNI space.
  3. H = Hemisphere; ALE = activation likelihood estimation; Nr. = number of studies that contributed to each cluster; L = left; BA = Brodmann area; ** = between brackets are the number of foci from each study that contributed to that specific cluster.