Table 1 Nitrogen use efficiency of red cabbage as influenced by bio-priming and fertilisation.

From: Optimizing nutrient use efficiency, productivity, energetics, and economics of red cabbage following mineral fertilization and biopriming with compatible rhizosphere microbes

Treatments

N use efficiency

Agronomic efficiency (kg kg−1)

Physiological efficiency (kg kg−1)

Apparent recovery efficiency (%)

Partial factor productivity (kg kg−1)

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–20

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

2016–2017

2017–2018

T1: Absolute control N:P2O5:K2O @ 0:0:0 kg ha−1

T2: RDF of N:P2O5:K2O @ 120:60:60 kg ha−1

9.48c

11.07c

28.59

33.21

32.73b

33.21d

13.97c

14.05c

T3: 75% RDF + Trichoderma harzianum

12.06bc

15.02abc

32.33

34.57

37.38b

43.39bc

18.06bc

18.99ab

T4: 75% RDF + Pseudomonas fluorescens

13.09abc

15.80ab

31.98

36.53

41.09b

43.49bc

19.08ab

19.77ab

T5: 75% RDF + Bacillus subtilis

11.45bc

14.55bc

33.74

37.49

34.03b

38.83 cd

17.44bc

18.52b

T6: 75% RDF + T. harzianum + P. fluorescens

17.44a

19.38a

32.02

34.48

54.10a

55.99a

23.44a

23.34a

T7: 75% RDF + P. fluorescens + B. subtilis

15.44ab

17.52ab

34.06

39.27

40.10b

44.57bc

21.44ab

21.49ab

T8: 75% RDF + T. harzianum + B. subtilis

13.69abc

16.70ab

30.96

34.75

36.76b

48.01b

19.68ab

20.67ab

T9: 75% RDF + T. harzianum + P. fluorescens + B. subtilis

10.96bc

13.97bc

32.58

35.89

33.83b

38.33 cd

16.95bc

17.94bc

  1. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among the treatments as per DMRT.