Table 5 Economics of red cabbage production as influenced by bio-priming and mineral fertilization.

From: Optimizing nutrient use efficiency, productivity, energetics, and economics of red cabbage following mineral fertilization and biopriming with compatible rhizosphere microbes

Treatments

2016–2017

2017–2018

Gross return (US $ ha−1)

Net return (US $ ha−1)

B:C ratio

Gross return (US $ ha−1)

Net return (US $ ha−1)

B:C ratio

T1: Absolute control N:P2O5:K2O @ 0:0:0 kg ha−1

4098c

2011c

0.96c

2714c

627c

0.30c

T2: RDF of N:P2O5:K2O @ 120:60:60 kg ha−1

12743ab

10588ab

4.91ab

12812b

10657b

4.95b

T3: 75% RDF + Trichoderma harzianum

12350b

10200b

4.74b

12987b

10836b

5.04b

T4: 75% RDF + Pseudomonas fluorescens

13050ab

10900ab

5.07ab

13522ab

11372ab

5.29ab

T5: 75% RDF + Bacillus subtilis

11932b

9782b

4.55b

12667b

10517b

4.89b

T6: 75% RDF + T. harzianum + P. fluorescens

16030a

13877a

6.45a

15966a

13813a

6.42a

T7: 75% RDF + P. fluorescens + B. subtilis

14662ab

12509ab

5.81ab

14700ab

12547ab

5.83ab

T8: 75% RDF + T. harzianum + B. subtilis

13462ab

11308ab

5.25ab

14136ab

11983ab

5.57ab

T9: 75% RDF + T. harzianum + P. fluorescens + B. subtilis

11596b

9440b

4.38b

12271b

10115b

4.69b

  1. 1 US $ = 66 INR; Produce cost calculated @ 0.76 US $ kg−1; Spencer (Supermarket) cost = 2.42 US $ kg−1.
  2. Different letters indicate significant differences at P ≤ 0.05 among the treatments as per DMRT.