Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-83995-3, published online 22 February 2021


The original version of this Article contained repeated errors in Tables 1, 2 and 4, where the values for “White blood cells, 103/μL” and “ESMcsa, cm2” were incorrectly given. The correct and incorrect values appear below.


Table 1


Incorrect:

Variables

All cases

N = 689

ESMcsa, cm2

1965 ± 759


Correct:

Variables

All cases

N = 689

ESMcsa, cm2

19.7 ± 7.6


Table 2


Incorrect:

 

Survivor group

n = 588

Non-survivor group

n = 101

HR (95% CI)

p

White blood cells, 103/µL

10,688 ± 5,013

10,877 ± 5,764

1.000 (1.000–1.000)

0.381

ESMcsa, cm2

2042 ± 763

1521 ± 558

0.999 (0.999–0.999)

 < 0.001


Correct:

 

Survivor group

n = 588

Non-survivor group

n = 101

HR (95% CI)

p

White blood cells, 103/µL

10.7 ± 5.0

10.9 ± 5.8

1.000 (1.000–1.000)

0.381

ESMcsa, cm2

20.4 ± 7.6

15.2 ± 5.6

0.999 (0.999–0.999)

 < 0.001


Table 4


Incorrect:

 

Survivor group

n = 635

Non-survivor group

n = 54

HR (95% CI)

p

White blood cells, 103/µL

10,733 ± 5,059

10,513 ± 5,892

1.000 (1.000–1.000)

0.856

ESMcsa, cm2

1998 ± 757

1540 ± 491

0.999 (0.999–1.000)

 < 0.001


Correct:

 

Survivor group

n = 635

Non-survivor group

n = 54

HR (95% CI)

p

White blood cells, 103/µL

10.7 ± 5.1

10.5 ± 5.9

1.000 (1.000–1.000)

0.856

ESMcsa, cm2

20.0 ± 7.6

15.4 ± 4.9

0.999 (0.999–1.000)

 < 0.001


The original Article has been corrected.