Table 3 Associations between choice on the 3AFC task and ratings task for each of the separate models (statistically significant differences in bold).
Estimate (SE) | P | |
|---|---|---|
Attractiveness | ||
Conception probability in all cycles | .02 (.08) | .840 |
Conception probability in “textbook” cycles | .18 (.08) | .031 |
E | − .05 (.08) | .516 |
P | − .08 (.08) | .302 |
E/P | − .06 (.08) | .555 |
Femininity | ||
Conception probability in all cycles | .23 (.09) | .086 |
Conception probability in “textbook” cycles | .04 (.09) | .660 |
E | .16 (.12) | .286 |
P | .09 (.09) | .287 |
E/P | .17 (.09) | .046 |
