Table 2 Relationship between hand surface organic acids and antimicrobial activity.

From: Lactic acid as a major contributor to hand surface infection barrier and its association with morbidity to infectious disease

Ā 

Components3

Value1

Correlation coefficient2

P-value2

Maximum

Minimum

Mean

E. coli

S. aureus

Influenza A Virus

E. coli

S. aureus

Influenza A virus

Organic acid (nmol/cm2)

Lactic acid

906

6

212

0.5561

0.6836

0.6689

0.000

0.000

0.000

Urocanic acid

14.90

0.17

3.25

0.3080

0.2514

0.1816

0.023

0.067

0.189

Malic acid

1.308

0.150

0.585

0.5834

0.6339

0.6272

0.000

0.000

0.000

Asparagine

1.710

0.062

0.570

0.0487

0.0611

0.1931

0.726

0.661

0.162

2-hydroxybutyricacid

0.223

0.029

0.116

0.5170

0.6253

0.6325

0.000

0.000

0.000

Glycolic acid

0.2140

0.0144

0.0652

0.0841

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0392

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0738

0.545

0.778

0.596

Citric acid

0.2138

0.0027

0.0487

0.5335

0.5568

0.5353

0.000

0.000

0.000

Ascorbic acid

0.1167

0.0000

0.0270

0.5750

0.6948

0.6946

0.000

0.000

0.000

Azelaic acid

0.1136

0.0023

0.0203

0.4100

0.3013

0.3391

0.002

0.027

0.012

2-oxoglutarate

0.0698

0.0000

0.0202

0.5981

0.7455

0.7537

0.000

0.000

0.000

Suberic acid

0.0426

0.0016

0.0127

0.3889

0.2933

0.3232

0.004

0.031

0.017

Succinic acid

0.1403

0.0006

0.0113

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0095

0.1295

0.0238

0.946

0.351

0.864

Fumaric acid

0.0375

0.0000

0.0105

0.5234

0.7057

0.6669

0.000

0.000

0.000

Sebacic acid

0.01209

0.00008

0.00161

0.1328

0.2002

0.1262

0.339

0.147

0.363

Pyridoxine

0.024862

0.000000

0.000845

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0890

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0661

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0938

0.522

0.635

0.500

Nicotinic acid

0.002420

0.000000

0.000257

0.0638

0.0492

0.0635

0.647

0.724

0.648

Pantothenic acid

0.0019567

0.0000000

0.0000642

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0262

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0580

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0776

0.851

0.677

0.577

FFA [C12:0]

0.23

0.01

0.04

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2586

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2410

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.1374

0.059

0.079

0.322

SQ

0.18

0.01

0.04

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0874

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0706

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0919

0.530

0.612

0.509

FFA[C18:0]

0.15

0.01

0.03

Ā āˆ’ā€‰0.2934

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.3120

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2542

0.031

0.022

0.064

FFA[C18:1]

0.10

0.00

0.02

0.0688

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0405

0.0740

0.621

0.771

0.595

WE

0.10

0.00

0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2548

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2342

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2209

0.063

0.088

0.109

FFA[C16:1]

0.06

0.00

0.01

0.0188

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.1093

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0826

0.893

0.432

0.553

SQepo

0.05

0.00

0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0573

0.0238

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0126

0.681

0.864

0.928

FFA[C15:0]

0.03

0.00

0.01

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0093

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.1336

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.1445

0.947

0.335

0.297

ChE

0.020

0.000

0.005

0.0221

0.0224

0.0261

0.874

0.872

0.851

DAG

0.030

0.000

0.004

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2956

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.3269

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.3575

0.030

0.016

0.008

SQOOH

0.010

0.000

0.001

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0947

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.0545

ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰0.2466

0.496

0.695

0.072

  1. 1The numbers correspond to the amounts that exist on the hand surface and are arranged in order of mean value.
  2. 2Correlation and P-value between each compound and antimicrobial activity were calculated using Holm-corrected Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Bold numbers show significant differences (P-value less than 0.05).
  3. 3Bold indicates the compounds that were significantly correlated with all antibacterial and antiviral activities.