Table 2 Content characteristics in Study 1 and 2 assessed manually by rater (top) and with Linguistic Inquiry Word Count (LIWC) software (bottom).

From: The think aloud paradigm reveals differences in the content, dynamics and conceptual scope of resting state thought in trait brooding

 

Study 1

Study 2

Study 1–Study 2 differences

Mean

SD

Median

Mean

SD

Median

Significance test

P-value

Thought Content: Manual ratings

% Internal

73%

17%

74%

74%

20%

76%

W = 674

0.88

% External / Perceptually-coupled

24%

15%

23%

23%

19%

21%

W = 727.50

0.69

% Interoceptive

3%

3%

1%

3%

4%

1%

W = 683.50

0.96

% Past

17%

11%

17%

17%

15%

12%

W = 782.50

0.33

% Present

50%

21%

50%

45%

22%

44%

W = 755.50

0.48

% Future

21%

18%

17%

27%

15%

25%

W = 519

0.076

% Atemporal

12%

10%

10%

11%

12%

8%

W = 776

0.36

Valence (-5 to 5 scale)

− 0.15

0.47

− .0.16

− 0.18

0.81

− 0.09

t = 0.20

0.84

Self-focus (0 to 4 scale)

2.18

0.72

2.13

2.18

0.61

2.21

t = − .0.05

0.96

Thought Content: Linguistic analysis with LIWC

% Use of personal pronoun “I”

9.72

2.74

9.55

9.75

2.78

9.93

t = − .0.05

0.96

% Positive emotion words

2.63

1.19

2.46

3.09

1.44

2.81

t = − 1.50

0.14

% Negative emotion words

1.78

1.06

1.71

1.75

.96

1.52

t = .0.10

0.92

% Past-related words

3.41

1.31

3.49

3.04

1.2

2.89

t = 1.23

0.23

  1. Statistical differences between Study 1 and 2 were evaluated with a two-tailed Welch t-test for normally distributed variables and a Wilcoxon rank-sum test for non-normally distributed variables. MNW Mean Number of Words.