Table 2 Comparison and analysis results of Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA for data points in the range of d/H = 0.50–0.70 and depth-averaged values at various verticals across the morphological units.
VR | TIu′ | TIv′ | TIw′ | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Step | Tread | Pool | Step | Tread | Pool | Step | Tread | Pool | Step | Tread | Pool | |
Case I: d/H = 0.50–0.70 | ||||||||||||
Mean | 0.70 | 0.43 | 0.31 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.36 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.24 | 0.1 | 0.16 | 0.38 |
Median | 0.68 | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.06 | 0.13 | 0.30 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.17 | 0.10 | 0.16 | 0.32 |
p value | 9.43E−14 | 4.55E−18 | 7.95E−18 | 5.94E−18 | ||||||||
Case II: Depth-averaged | ||||||||||||
Mean | 0.69 | 0.40 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.17 | 0.52 |
Median | 0.66 | 0.41 | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.16 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.11 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.17 | 0.37 |
p value | 1.91E−04 | 2.84E−05 | 3.93E−05 | 3.22E−05 | ||||||||