Table 1 Effect of individual compounds on viability of GBM cell lines (N ≥ 4).

From: Viability fingerprint of glioblastoma cell lines: roles of mitotic, proliferative, and epigenetic targets

Compound

U-251 MG

T98-G

pIC50 [CI]

IC50, µM

Bottom plateau, % [CI]

pIC50 [CI]

IC50, µM

Bottom plateau, % [CI]

Temozolomide

3.50 [3.63 to 3.37]

317

0 [− 5 to 4] (ns)

3.60 [3.73 to 3.48]

249

0 [− 5 to 5] (ns)

Lomustine

4.50 [4.57 to 4.43]

31.6

0 [− 3 to 4] (ns)

4.08 [4.15 to 4.00]

84.1

0 [− 5 to 4] (ns)

Pasireotide

4.02 [4.28 to 3.76]

96.4

0 [− 8 to 8] (ns)

4.00 [4.30 to 3.71]

99.3

0 [− 10 to 10] (ns)

CYN 154,806

3.02 [3.45 to 2.58]

962

0 [− 9 to 8] (ns)

3.44 [3.69 to 3.20]

360

0 [− 10 to 9] (ns)

MK-2206

5.17 [5.28 to 5.06]

6.82

1 [− 4 to 6] (ns)

4.77 [4.88 to 4.66]

17.1

 − 6 [− 12 to 1] (ns)

ARQ 092

5.06 [5.17 to 4.96]

8.72

 − 3 [− 8 to 3] (ns)

4.54 [4.67 to 4.42]

28.9

 − 5 [− 13 to 2] (ns)

ARC-775

4.84 [4.96 to 4.73]

14.3

0 [− 8 to 9] (ns)

4.71 [4.84 to 4.57]

19.7

1 [− 9 to 10] (ns)

CX-4945

5.30 [5.41 to 5.19]

5.05

4 [− 5 to 11] (ns)

5.17 [5.30 to 5.04]

6.79

3 [− 7 to 12] (ns)

SAHA

4.83 [4.94 to 4.73]

14.8

 − 1 [− 7 to 4] (ns)

4.70 [4.82 to 4.59]

20.0

 − 4 [− 11 to 2] (ns)

Azacytidine

5.11 [5.24 to 5.00]

7.68

12 [7 to 17] (***)

4.99 [5.12 to 4.86]

10.3

6 [0 to 12] (ns)

MK-1775

5.69 [5.83 to 5.55]

2.06

27 [23 to 30] (***)

6.47 [6.60 to 6.34]

0.341

17 [14 to 21] (***)

CC-115

6.33 [6.43 to 6.24]

0.469

17 [14 to 19] (***)

5.57 [5.69 to 5.46]

2.68

16 [13 to 20] (***)

MLN8237

10.0 [10.4 to 9.69]

0.0000979

43 [39 to 48] (***)

10.2 [10.7 to 9.69]

0.0000669

56 [52 to 61] (***)

VX 689

7.22 [7.53 to 6.93]

0.0597

49 [43 to 55] (***)

7.23 [7.59 to 6.87]

0.0589

54 [47 to 61] (***)

AZD1152-HQPA

7.63 [7.97 to 7.30]

0.0235

66 [62 to 70] (***)

6.00 [6.40 to 5.60]

1.01

67 [61 to 73] (***)

  1. CI, 95% confidence interval; ns, not significant; pIC50, negative logarithm of the half maximal inhibitory concentration. The asterisks indicate the significance of grouped comparison of the dose–response bottom plateau value obtained for each treatment condition relative to zero (one-way ANOVA; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant).