Table 2 Prevalence of demographic and clinical characteristics in men with prostate cancer living in outer regional/remote areas of Tasmania relative to their counterparts living in inner regional areas.
From: Urban–rural prostate cancer disparities in a regional state of Australia
|  | Unadjusted PR (95% CI) | Adjusted* PR (95% CI) | Adjusted†PR (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|---|
Age at diagnosis | |||
< 60 | n.a |  |  |
60–64 | 0.69 (0.55–0.86) |  |  |
65–69 | 1.26 (1.07–1.50) |  |  |
 ≥ 70 | 1.14 (1.02–1.28) |  |  |
SEIFA quintile | |||
1 (Most disadvantaged) | n.a | n.a | Â |
2 | 3.12 (2.63–3.70) | 3.13 (2.63–3.72) |  |
3 | 2.53 (2.03–3.14) | 2.56 (2.04–3.20) |  |
4 | 0.55 (0.45–0.68) | 0.56 (0.45–0.69) |  |
5 (Most advantaged) | 0.11 (0.07–0.16) | 0.10 (0.07–0.15) |  |
Method of diagnosis | |||
TRUS | n.a | n.a | Â |
TURP | 1.13 (0.85–1.50) | 0.94 (0.74–1.19) |  |
TP Biopsy | 1.05 (0.97–1.13) | 1.07 (0.99–1.15) |  |
Other | 0.97 (0.47–1.98) | 0.81 (0.40–1.64) |  |
Diagnostic PSA (ng/mL) | |||
 ≤ 4 | n.a | n.a | n.a |
4.01–10 | 0.92 (0.83–1.01) | 0.99 (0.90–1.08) | 1.00 (0.90–1.11) |
10.01–20 | 1.35 (1.13–1.62) | 1.24 (1.02–1.49) | 1.11 (0.93–1.32) |
 > 20.01 | 1.10 (0.84–1.45) | 0.91 (0.73–1.14) | 0.88 (0.75–1.02) |
Gleason score | |||
< 7 | n.a | n.a | n.a |
7 (3 + 4) | 0.99 (0.84–1.17) | 1.04 (0.87–1.23) | 1.08 (0.90–1.3) |
7 (4 + 3) | 1.27 (1.01–1.59) | 1.20 (0.94–1.53) | 1.02 (0.78–1.3) |
 ≥ 8 | 1.21 (1.02–1.43) | 0.98 (0.82–1.16) | 1.20 (0.99–1.46) |
NCCN risk | |||
Low | 0.70 (0.58–0.84) | 0.75 (0.62–0.89) | 0.88 (0.73–1.08) |
Intermediate | n.a | n.a | n.a |
high | 1.30 (1.11–1.52) | 1.31 (1.13–1.52) | 1.22 (1.01–1.47) |
Very high/metastatic | 0.99 (0.74–1.32) | 0.99 (0.74–1.31) | 0.87 (0.58–1.29) |
Diagnostic facility | |||
Public | n.a | n.a | Â |
Private | 0.82 (0.76–0.88) | 0.82 (0.76–0.87) |  |
Treatment facility (active treatment) | |||
Public | n.a | n.a | Â |
Private | 0.83 (0.72–0.95) | 0.84 (0.73–0.97) |  |